IPTV News
IPTV Service Providers
Internet TV
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Products
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Books
Contact
|
Advertise
|
About
Search
Search for
Internet TV
Subscribe
Subscribe to our RSS feed
Bookmark TVover.net
Subscribe to our email newsletter
News Categories
Apple TV
ATT U-verse
Boxee
Broadband over Powerline
Connected TV
Digital Content Creation and Distribution
Divx
DRM and CA
End-to-End IPTV Solutions
Game on Demand
General
Google TV
HomePNA
Interactive TV
Internet TV
Internet TV Updates
Investments
IP Equipment
IP Networking
IP Solutions
iPad
IPTV Advertising Solutions
IPTV Books
IPTV Events
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Headends
IPTV Headlines
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Management Solutions
IPTV Middleware
IPTV Regulation
IPTV Reports
IPTV Service Quality
IPTV Set-Top Boxes
IPTV Standards
Media Center Solutions
Mergers and Acquisitions
Microsoft IPTV
Mobile TV
Multiscreen
Offbeat News
Online Video
PVR Hardware
PVR Software
Roku
Satellite IPTV
SBC Project Lightspeed
Service Providers
Africa IPTV
Asia IPTV
Australia IPTV
Europe IPTV
Middle East
Middle East IPTV
North America IPTV
South America IPTV
Slingbox
TV Everywhere
Ultra Wideband (UWB)
Verizon FiOS
Video on Demand
What is IPTV
White Papers
Wi-Fi IPTV
WiMAX
Archives
November, 2012 (4)
October, 2012 (17)
September, 2012 (18)
August, 2012 (8)
July, 2012 (19)
June, 2012 (13)
May, 2012 (20)
April, 2012 (29)
March, 2012 (24)
February, 2012 (16)
January, 2012 (11)
December, 2011 (9)
November, 2011 (12)
October, 2011 (32)
September, 2011 (23)
August, 2011 (31)
July, 2011 (25)
June, 2011 (35)
May, 2011 (48)
April, 2011 (48)
March, 2011 (79)
February, 2011 (48)
January, 2011 (38)
December, 2010 (23)
November, 2010 (47)
October, 2010 (37)
September, 2010 (59)
August, 2010 (41)
July, 2010 (33)
June, 2010 (35)
May, 2010 (58)
April, 2010 (49)
March, 2010 (73)
February, 2010 (53)
January, 2010 (26)
December, 2009 (34)
November, 2009 (52)
October, 2009 (55)
September, 2009 (59)
August, 2009 (38)
July, 2009 (28)
June, 2009 (66)
May, 2009 (63)
April, 2009 (38)
March, 2009 (73)
February, 2009 (43)
January, 2009 (60)
December, 2008 (42)
November, 2008 (77)
October, 2008 (71)
September, 2008 (102)
August, 2008 (62)
July, 2008 (75)
June, 2008 (83)
May, 2008 (60)
April, 2008 (95)
March, 2008 (98)
February, 2008 (65)
January, 2008 (94)
December, 2007 (66)
November, 2007 (56)
October, 2007 (113)
September, 2007 (56)
August, 2007 (76)
July, 2007 (88)
June, 2007 (78)
May, 2007 (62)
April, 2007 (55)
March, 2007 (86)
February, 2007 (98)
January, 2007 (97)
December, 2006 (53)
November, 2006 (100)
October, 2006 (115)
September, 2006 (171)
August, 2006 (79)
July, 2006 (97)
June, 2006 (160)
May, 2006 (148)
April, 2006 (132)
March, 2006 (162)
February, 2006 (98)
January, 2006 (95)
December, 2005 (76)
November, 2005 (122)
October, 2005 (105)
September, 2005 (122)
August, 2005 (104)
July, 2005 (61)
June, 2005 (104)
May, 2005 (93)
April, 2005 (166)
March, 2005 (50)
February, 2005 (6)
December, 2004 (1)
Court Invalidates Verizon Countersuit Claims Against ActiveVideo
ActiveVideo Networks
announced that an order has been issued invalidating asserted claims of two key Verizon Communications patents in the year-long litigation initially filed by ActiveVideo in May, 2010.
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Honorable Raymond A. Jackson invalidated all asserted claims of the two patents: United States Patent No. 5,682,325, which was included in a suit against ActiveVideo Networks, and United States Patent No. 6,381,748, which was included in suits against both ActiveVideo Networks and Cablevision Systems Corporation.
"The decision is important to ActiveVideo and to our customers," said Jeff Miller, president and CEO of ActiveVideo Networks. "Obviously we're pleased at the elimination of Verizon's claims against our company, but it is equally important that the ruling removes claims by Verizon against our customer, Cablevision."
On April 7, 2011 Judge Jackson issued an order, called a "Markman order," construing the claims of five ActiveVideo patents included in the company's suit against Verizon. The patents, which are fundamental to interactive television services such as video on demand, include:
United States Patent No. 6,034,678, titled "Cable Television System With Remote Interactive Processor;"
United States Patent No. 5,550,578, titled "Interactive And Conventional Television Information System;"
United States Patent No. 6,100,883, titled "Home Interface Controller for Providing Interactive Cable Television;"
United States Patent No. 5,526,034, titled "Interactive Home Information System with Signal Assignment;" and
United States Patent No. 6,205,582, titled "Interactive Cable Television System With Frame Server."
"We were extremely pleased with the Markman order," said Miller. "The court's construction essentially tracked ActiveVideo's proposals and provides powerful support for our infringement case against Verizon. ActiveVideo's patent portfolio covers the core technology required for delivery of Video on Demand, and interactive services offered by Verizon on its FiOS network.
"We are confident that we will recover not only damages for Verizon's infringement, but also enjoin Verizon from using ActiveVideo's patented technology," Miller continued. "Beginning in 2005, we shared our technology with Verizon and tried to reach an agreement to deploy our CloudTV solution on the FiOS network. Verizon declined to do business with us and instead has infringed our patents."
Trial is set for July 12, 2011.
Posted on May 17, 2011
Reviews
|
Share
|
Digg
Filed in:
General
Related Entries
•
Netgem Join the Wireless Broadband Alliance
•
Verimatrix Selects Arxan to Secure Premium Streaming Content Across Desktop and Mobile Platforms
•
Espial Accelerates the Adoption of IPTV Technology in Joining The Open IPTV Forum
•
DISH Enhances Its International IPTV Services
•
NanoTech Entertainment Expands Into Television
•
UTStarcom to Spin Out IPTV Business, Change Leadership
Comments are closed.
Post a Comment
Please use a valid e-mail address. Your address will not be publicly visible and is only a means for us to contact you when asked. Thank you.
All brand, company, and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective owners. © 2012 TVover.net. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms