IPTV News
IPTV Service Providers
Internet TV
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Products
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Books
Contact
|
Advertise
|
About
Search
Search for
Internet TV
Subscribe
Subscribe to our RSS feed
Bookmark TVover.net
Subscribe to our email newsletter
News Categories
Apple TV
ATT U-verse
Boxee
Broadband over Powerline
Connected TV
Digital Content Creation and Distribution
Divx
DRM and CA
End-to-End IPTV Solutions
Game on Demand
General
Google TV
HomePNA
Interactive TV
Internet TV
Internet TV Updates
Investments
IP Equipment
IP Networking
IP Solutions
iPad
IPTV Advertising Solutions
IPTV Books
IPTV Events
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Headends
IPTV Headlines
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Management Solutions
IPTV Middleware
IPTV Regulation
IPTV Reports
IPTV Service Quality
IPTV Set-Top Boxes
IPTV Standards
Media Center Solutions
Mergers and Acquisitions
Microsoft IPTV
Mobile TV
Multiscreen
Offbeat News
Online Video
PVR Hardware
PVR Software
Roku
Satellite IPTV
SBC Project Lightspeed
Service Providers
Africa IPTV
Asia IPTV
Australia IPTV
Europe IPTV
Middle East
Middle East IPTV
North America IPTV
South America IPTV
Slingbox
TV Everywhere
Ultra Wideband (UWB)
Verizon FiOS
Video on Demand
What is IPTV
White Papers
Wi-Fi IPTV
WiMAX
Archives
November, 2012 (4)
October, 2012 (17)
September, 2012 (18)
August, 2012 (8)
July, 2012 (19)
June, 2012 (13)
May, 2012 (20)
April, 2012 (29)
March, 2012 (24)
February, 2012 (16)
January, 2012 (11)
December, 2011 (9)
November, 2011 (12)
October, 2011 (32)
September, 2011 (23)
August, 2011 (31)
July, 2011 (25)
June, 2011 (35)
May, 2011 (48)
April, 2011 (48)
March, 2011 (79)
February, 2011 (48)
January, 2011 (38)
December, 2010 (23)
November, 2010 (47)
October, 2010 (37)
September, 2010 (59)
August, 2010 (41)
July, 2010 (33)
June, 2010 (35)
May, 2010 (58)
April, 2010 (49)
March, 2010 (73)
February, 2010 (53)
January, 2010 (26)
December, 2009 (34)
November, 2009 (52)
October, 2009 (55)
September, 2009 (59)
August, 2009 (38)
July, 2009 (28)
June, 2009 (66)
May, 2009 (63)
April, 2009 (38)
March, 2009 (73)
February, 2009 (43)
January, 2009 (60)
December, 2008 (42)
November, 2008 (77)
October, 2008 (71)
September, 2008 (102)
August, 2008 (62)
July, 2008 (75)
June, 2008 (83)
May, 2008 (60)
April, 2008 (95)
March, 2008 (98)
February, 2008 (65)
January, 2008 (94)
December, 2007 (66)
November, 2007 (56)
October, 2007 (113)
September, 2007 (56)
August, 2007 (76)
July, 2007 (88)
June, 2007 (78)
May, 2007 (62)
April, 2007 (55)
March, 2007 (86)
February, 2007 (98)
January, 2007 (97)
December, 2006 (53)
November, 2006 (100)
October, 2006 (115)
September, 2006 (171)
August, 2006 (79)
July, 2006 (97)
June, 2006 (160)
May, 2006 (148)
April, 2006 (132)
March, 2006 (162)
February, 2006 (98)
January, 2006 (95)
December, 2005 (76)
November, 2005 (122)
October, 2005 (105)
September, 2005 (122)
August, 2005 (104)
July, 2005 (61)
June, 2005 (104)
May, 2005 (93)
April, 2005 (166)
March, 2005 (50)
February, 2005 (6)
December, 2004 (1)
Pulver to FCC: Don't Touch Video on the Net
Jeff Pulver, acting through online video site, Network2, has petitioned the Federal Communications Commission to declare that Internet video is not subject to cable and broadcast television regulations and that the FCC does not intend to impose new regulations on Internet Video.
"Internet Video allows professionals and non-professionals alike to produce a wide variety of high-quality video content and to make it available to anyone, anywhere, at any time and at little or no incremental cost," commented Jeff Pulver, founder and CEO of Network2. "Internet Video shares none of the conditions that provided the basis for traditional broadcast and cable regulation. From a technical standpoint, Internet Video is simply a piece of code, a software application riding over the Internet Protocol. Internet Video is not tied to underlying network infrastructure in the same ways that cable and broadcast-based video content currently is tethered."
"A technology that eliminates previous barriers to free speech, and makes the free press even more accessible to and by all, should remain free of unnecessary regulations that were uniquely designed and suited for the environment of legacy video platforms," noted Jonathan Askin, attorney to Network2. "Threats to impose legacy broadcast or cable regulation on Internet Video burden the continued growth of what is emerging as a powerful and flexible platform for video publishers and a vibrant and diverse source of new content for consumers."
"Grant of this Petition will provide regulatory certainty that will promote additional investment and innovation, continued deployment of broadband facilities, and the United States' role as a leader in new approaches to the production and distribution of media over the Internet," Askin added.
"The promise of Internet Video is staggering, the potential benefits to American society enormous. The United States has been the greatest exporter of content the world has ever known. The enabling power of the Internet should allow every interested American with a broadband connection to become a global content producer. Combined with America's dominance in the Internet, in software and content creation, the United States should be able to further expand its leadership in global media and entertainment. We are about to reap the enormous benefits as the Internet and media merge and morph to enable this emerging industry. We certainly do not want to turn over our leadership to others. The right policy approach, that ensures that the Internet Video industry may grow unfettered by unnecessary and burdensome regulation, will ensure that America remains the global leader in media, in entertainment, in content creation and in the Internet."
"Unlike almost all other forms of electronic media distribution, Internet Video observes few geographic, political and regulatory boundaries," added Askin. "Thus, even the actions of other nations can compound regulatory uncertainty for Internet Video providers. Will a provider in one country face burdensome or limiting regulations that a competitor in another country will escape? Where should new Internet Video businesses be incorporated, built, hosted and operated? Efforts to impose traditional broadcast and cable regulation on Internet Video create substantial uncertainty for Internet Video providers. Because regulation affects choices about investment of human and financial capital, the requested declaratory relief will allow for better decision making and open the way for the continued growth of Internet Video, with all of its benefits."
Posted on Mar 20, 2007
Reviews
|
Share
|
Digg
Filed in:
IPTV Regulation
Related Entries
•
Naperville Fights Video Franchise Reform
•
Cablevision Loses Landmark Network DVR Case
•
FCC Streamlines Video Franchise Process
•
California Approves State Video Franchise Reform
•
EU Launches Legal Battle with Germany over DT
•
Tennessee Pursues Franchise Reform
Comments are closed.
Post a Comment
Please use a valid e-mail address. Your address will not be publicly visible and is only a means for us to contact you when asked. Thank you.
All brand, company, and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective owners. © 2012 TVover.net. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms