IPTV News
IPTV Service Providers
Internet TV
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Products
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Books
Contact
|
Advertise
|
About
Search
Search for
Internet TV
Subscribe
Subscribe to our RSS feed
Bookmark TVover.net
Subscribe to our email newsletter
News Categories
Apple TV
ATT U-verse
Boxee
Broadband over Powerline
Connected TV
Digital Content Creation and Distribution
Divx
DRM and CA
End-to-End IPTV Solutions
Game on Demand
General
Google TV
HomePNA
Interactive TV
Internet TV
Internet TV Updates
Investments
IP Equipment
IP Networking
IP Solutions
iPad
IPTV Advertising Solutions
IPTV Books
IPTV Events
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Headends
IPTV Headlines
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Management Solutions
IPTV Middleware
IPTV Regulation
IPTV Reports
IPTV Service Quality
IPTV Set-Top Boxes
IPTV Standards
Media Center Solutions
Mergers and Acquisitions
Microsoft IPTV
Mobile TV
Multiscreen
Offbeat News
Online Video
PVR Hardware
PVR Software
Roku
Satellite IPTV
SBC Project Lightspeed
Service Providers
Africa IPTV
Asia IPTV
Australia IPTV
Europe IPTV
Middle East
Middle East IPTV
North America IPTV
South America IPTV
Slingbox
TV Everywhere
Ultra Wideband (UWB)
Verizon FiOS
Video on Demand
What is IPTV
White Papers
Wi-Fi IPTV
WiMAX
Archives
November, 2012 (4)
October, 2012 (17)
September, 2012 (18)
August, 2012 (8)
July, 2012 (19)
June, 2012 (13)
May, 2012 (20)
April, 2012 (29)
March, 2012 (24)
February, 2012 (16)
January, 2012 (11)
December, 2011 (9)
November, 2011 (12)
October, 2011 (32)
September, 2011 (23)
August, 2011 (31)
July, 2011 (25)
June, 2011 (35)
May, 2011 (48)
April, 2011 (48)
March, 2011 (79)
February, 2011 (48)
January, 2011 (38)
December, 2010 (23)
November, 2010 (47)
October, 2010 (37)
September, 2010 (59)
August, 2010 (41)
July, 2010 (33)
June, 2010 (35)
May, 2010 (58)
April, 2010 (49)
March, 2010 (73)
February, 2010 (53)
January, 2010 (26)
December, 2009 (34)
November, 2009 (52)
October, 2009 (55)
September, 2009 (59)
August, 2009 (38)
July, 2009 (28)
June, 2009 (66)
May, 2009 (63)
April, 2009 (38)
March, 2009 (73)
February, 2009 (43)
January, 2009 (60)
December, 2008 (42)
November, 2008 (77)
October, 2008 (71)
September, 2008 (102)
August, 2008 (62)
July, 2008 (75)
June, 2008 (83)
May, 2008 (60)
April, 2008 (95)
March, 2008 (98)
February, 2008 (65)
January, 2008 (94)
December, 2007 (66)
November, 2007 (56)
October, 2007 (113)
September, 2007 (56)
August, 2007 (76)
July, 2007 (88)
June, 2007 (78)
May, 2007 (62)
April, 2007 (55)
March, 2007 (86)
February, 2007 (98)
January, 2007 (97)
December, 2006 (53)
November, 2006 (100)
October, 2006 (115)
September, 2006 (171)
August, 2006 (79)
July, 2006 (97)
June, 2006 (160)
May, 2006 (148)
April, 2006 (132)
March, 2006 (162)
February, 2006 (98)
January, 2006 (95)
December, 2005 (76)
November, 2005 (122)
October, 2005 (105)
September, 2005 (122)
August, 2005 (104)
July, 2005 (61)
June, 2005 (104)
May, 2005 (93)
April, 2005 (166)
March, 2005 (50)
February, 2005 (6)
December, 2004 (1)
MPEG-4 Likely to be China's IPTV Coding Standard
Analysys International says that MPEG-4 will most probably be chosen as China's IPTV coding (encoding and decoding) standard, which will be decided at the end of year 2005.
News Background:
China's IPTV industry policy, technology and standard workshop was held on November 24th in Beijing. Based on information from the workshop, it is understood that the IPTV standard is currently being drafted. The first draft will be issued at the end of year 2005. The standard will cover 7 aspects: business requirements, general structure, DVB, business platform interfaces, operation platform interfaces, support of the access equipments and study on video coding (encoding & decoding).
Quick Analysis:
Analysys International believes that the most critical issue of IPTV technology is the coding standard. Telecom operators and broadcasting service providers can only solve this problem together. Although telecom operators are trying to push the process of IPTV commercialization and formulate related technical standard by themselves, it is still impossible for the IPTV industry to boom since the only IPTV license is in the hand of Shanghai Media Group.
Telecom operators have a similar attitude towards the two major coding standards of H.264 and MPEG-4 as other players in the industry value chain. They know H.264 is theoretically advanced, but the technical immaturity and higher cost of H.264 DVB have driven the operators into a dilemma: to deploy MPEG-4 first for its much lower risk and then update it later at a fairly high cost; or deploy H.264 from the beginning at a rather high technical risk.
For broadcasting service providers, the current standard they adopted for digital TV is MPEG-2. To transfer the MPEG-2 programs into MPEG-4 format is much easier than transferring into H.264 format. So although the broadcasting industry didn't clearly show their thoughts, Analysys International believes they prefer to choose MPEG-4.
Analysys' Position:
Analysys International thinks that the coding standard will inevitably become the result of a balance of risk, cost and time between telecom operators and broadcasting service providers. If they want to reach an agreement and set up a standard by the end of year 2005, MPEG-4 will most probably become the choice of both parties.
Additional information is available in Analysys International's website:
http://english.analysys.com.cn
.
Posted on Dec 07, 2005
Reviews
|
Share
|
Digg
Filed in:
IPTV Reports
Related Entries
•
Report: MRG Ranks Global IPTV Market Leaders
•
TelcoTV Previews U.S. Consumer Video Consumption Survey Findings
•
Report: IPTV Operators Turning Up the Heat with Multi-Screen TV, Content Discovery, Social Networking
•
Report: Global IPTV Industry
•
Report: Video Infrastructure Markets Growing Despite Challenges; Big Year for Multi-Screen TV
•
Report: Internet TV Global Business Strategic Report 2012
Comments are closed.
Post a Comment
Please use a valid e-mail address. Your address will not be publicly visible and is only a means for us to contact you when asked. Thank you.
All brand, company, and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective owners. © 2012 TVover.net. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms