IPTV News
IPTV Service Providers
Internet TV
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Products
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Books
Contact
|
Advertise
|
About
Search
Search for
Internet TV
Subscribe
Subscribe to our RSS feed
Bookmark TVover.net
Subscribe to our email newsletter
News Categories
Apple TV
ATT U-verse
Boxee
Broadband over Powerline
Connected TV
Digital Content Creation and Distribution
Divx
DRM and CA
End-to-End IPTV Solutions
Game on Demand
General
Google TV
HomePNA
Interactive TV
Internet TV
Internet TV Updates
Investments
IP Equipment
IP Networking
IP Solutions
iPad
IPTV Advertising Solutions
IPTV Books
IPTV Events
IPTV Events Calendar
IPTV Headends
IPTV Headlines
IPTV Jobs
IPTV Management Solutions
IPTV Middleware
IPTV Regulation
IPTV Reports
IPTV Service Quality
IPTV Set-Top Boxes
IPTV Standards
Media Center Solutions
Mergers and Acquisitions
Microsoft IPTV
Mobile TV
Multiscreen
Offbeat News
Online Video
PVR Hardware
PVR Software
Roku
Satellite IPTV
SBC Project Lightspeed
Service Providers
Africa IPTV
Asia IPTV
Australia IPTV
Europe IPTV
Middle East
Middle East IPTV
North America IPTV
South America IPTV
Slingbox
TV Everywhere
Ultra Wideband (UWB)
Verizon FiOS
Video on Demand
What is IPTV
White Papers
Wi-Fi IPTV
WiMAX
Archives
November, 2012 (4)
October, 2012 (17)
September, 2012 (18)
August, 2012 (8)
July, 2012 (19)
June, 2012 (13)
May, 2012 (20)
April, 2012 (29)
March, 2012 (24)
February, 2012 (16)
January, 2012 (11)
December, 2011 (9)
November, 2011 (12)
October, 2011 (32)
September, 2011 (23)
August, 2011 (31)
July, 2011 (25)
June, 2011 (35)
May, 2011 (48)
April, 2011 (48)
March, 2011 (79)
February, 2011 (48)
January, 2011 (38)
December, 2010 (23)
November, 2010 (47)
October, 2010 (37)
September, 2010 (59)
August, 2010 (41)
July, 2010 (33)
June, 2010 (35)
May, 2010 (58)
April, 2010 (49)
March, 2010 (73)
February, 2010 (53)
January, 2010 (26)
December, 2009 (34)
November, 2009 (52)
October, 2009 (55)
September, 2009 (59)
August, 2009 (38)
July, 2009 (28)
June, 2009 (66)
May, 2009 (63)
April, 2009 (38)
March, 2009 (73)
February, 2009 (43)
January, 2009 (60)
December, 2008 (42)
November, 2008 (77)
October, 2008 (71)
September, 2008 (102)
August, 2008 (62)
July, 2008 (75)
June, 2008 (83)
May, 2008 (60)
April, 2008 (95)
March, 2008 (98)
February, 2008 (65)
January, 2008 (94)
December, 2007 (66)
November, 2007 (56)
October, 2007 (113)
September, 2007 (56)
August, 2007 (76)
July, 2007 (88)
June, 2007 (78)
May, 2007 (62)
April, 2007 (55)
March, 2007 (86)
February, 2007 (98)
January, 2007 (97)
December, 2006 (53)
November, 2006 (100)
October, 2006 (115)
September, 2006 (171)
August, 2006 (79)
July, 2006 (97)
June, 2006 (160)
May, 2006 (148)
April, 2006 (132)
March, 2006 (162)
February, 2006 (98)
January, 2006 (95)
December, 2005 (76)
November, 2005 (122)
October, 2005 (105)
September, 2005 (122)
August, 2005 (104)
July, 2005 (61)
June, 2005 (104)
May, 2005 (93)
April, 2005 (166)
March, 2005 (50)
February, 2005 (6)
December, 2004 (1)
Most Americans Want Choice for Cable TV Service
More than 80 percent of American consumers believe better prices and service will emerge if cable TV companies have to compete for customers, and most of those consumers want their elected officials to take action to encourage competition, according to a survey released today by national advocacy group Consumers for Cable Choice.
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights meets Wednesday to discuss the status of competition in the industry and consider ways to free consumers from monopoly cable television service.
"Americans want choice, competition and more innovation in cable television and we are encouraged that the Committee Members are listening to those consumers and taking on this important policy issue," said Robert K. Johnson, president of Consumers for Cable Choice. "Our survey clearly shows that Americans want competition so they can get better prices, better service and more innovative service."
The Senate subcommittee meets Wednesday, September 28, 2005, at 2 p.m. in Room 226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building for a hearing that has been headlined as "Video Competition in 2005 - More Consolidation, or New Choices for Consumers." Several bills are pending in the Senate that will reform the cable industry to allow competitive choices for consumers, including the Video Choice Act of 2005 (Rockefeller/Smith).
Under the current cable monopoly system, cable rates have increased 86% in the past decade, according to U.S. government data. At the same time, in customer satisfaction surveys by J.D. Power and others, cable consistently has received poor marks.
The Consumers for Cable Choice survey was conducted September 7-11 and asked 1,000 people across the country about their views on cable competition. Survey highlights:
87 percent said there should be more choices of TV providers so consumers can keep prices in check;
83 percent said it's time there are more choices for TV programming because competition will keep cable companies from raising rates all the time;
82 percent said there should be more companies offering TV programming and video on demand services to compete with local cable providers;
76 percent said if customers had a choice for TV service, cable companies would be forced to offer better customer service;
Additionally, more than two-thirds of consumers indicated they would have a more positive opinion of elected officials at all levels if they helped bring more consumer choice and greater competition for television services.
Posted on Sep 26, 2005
Reviews
|
Share
|
Digg
Filed in:
IPTV Reports
Related Entries
•
Report: MRG Ranks Global IPTV Market Leaders
•
TelcoTV Previews U.S. Consumer Video Consumption Survey Findings
•
Report: IPTV Operators Turning Up the Heat with Multi-Screen TV, Content Discovery, Social Networking
•
Report: Global IPTV Industry
•
Report: Video Infrastructure Markets Growing Despite Challenges; Big Year for Multi-Screen TV
•
Report: Internet TV Global Business Strategic Report 2012
Comments are closed.
Post a Comment
Please use a valid e-mail address. Your address will not be publicly visible and is only a means for us to contact you when asked. Thank you.
All brand, company, and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective owners. © 2012 TVover.net. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms